Top Quartile Stocks — performance

What the four-filter stock screen would have returned, rebalanced monthly vs SPY

Updated May 29, 2026

The home page’s Top Quartileis the intersection of the four independent scores on every stock’s card: names sitting in the top 25% of the universe on Market Beat (excess return vs SPY), Rank Persistence (how consistently they hold their cross-sectional rank week over week), Business Growth(revenue, margin and cash-flow momentum) and Money Flow(buying vs selling pressure) — all at once. It’s a demanding screen, so the basket is usually small.

This page asks the obvious next question: if you had actually held that basket — equal-weighted, refreshed at each monthly snapshot — how would it have done? Below, every month’s basket return is plotted against SPY over the same window, and the two are compounded into a cumulative curve.

This month’s basket

Locked May 29, 2026 · 14 names · equal-weight · tracked daily through July 24, 2026. Updates when the next month begins.

Basket · MTD
−14.5%
SPY · MTD
−0.9%
Excess
−13.6 pp
Up / down
2 / 12
Leader · NUE
+13.0%
Laggard · GLW
−33.5%
Day by day · basket vs SPY
The 14picks · lock-in scores & month-to-date
StockPerformPersistProfitFlowMTD
NUENucor Corporation95827699+13.0%
DELLDell Technologies Inc.987686100+2.8%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.99979597−3.5%
STXSeagate Technology Holdings plc99969898−6.9%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1009910091−10.8%
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.93829395−12.6%
HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.80879880−12.7%
WDCWestern Digital Corporation100999095−13.1%
CIENCiena Corporation99979592−15.5%
LRCXLam Research Corporation98949480−22.0%
MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.98908399−28.6%
SNDKSandisk Corporation1001007995−29.3%
APPAppLovin Corporation84829886−30.6%
GLWCorning Incorporated98879485−33.5%

The 3-year track record

Every month of the last 3 years — equal-weight, rebalanced each anchor, against SPY.

THE SCREEN · top 25% (percentile ≥ 75) on Market Beat · Trend Persistence · Money Flow · Business Growth · equal-weight · rebalanced each anchor · vs SPY.

Picks · 39 mo
+397.0%
SPY · same
+76.8%
Excess (cum)
+320 pp
Avg / month
+4.71%
Win rate vs SPY
67%
Avg basket
5

Cumulative growth — $1 in the basket vs SPY

PicksSPY

Monthly returns — basket vs SPY

PicksSPY

What this shows

Over the last three years the screen has comfortably out-earned the index — but it earns it the hard way. The edge is concentrated in a handful of explosive months and given partly back in sharp drawdowns; this is a momentum-and-quality basket, so it amplifies the market in both directions. The win rate (months it beats SPY) sits around three-in-five, not nine-in-ten.

The honest read: the screen has been a strong signal for where leadership is concentrated, not a smooth ride. Anyone treating it as a live strategy would feel the volatility and pay the turnover.

Read the fine print
  • Not investment advice by any means — this is just a computation from historical data, shown to illustrate how the screen would have behaved. The future is not obligated to rhyme.
  • Gross of costs. No commissions, spreads, or taxes. The basket turns over heavily each month (~5 names swapped), so real-world friction would meaningfully dent these figures.
  • Last 3 years only. A short, deliberate window using point-in-time data, but not completely free of survivorship bias.
  • Rebalanced at ~monthly anchors (≈28-day spacing, not calendar month-ends), holding from one anchor to the next; a month with no qualifying names sits in cash. Returns use split-adjusted closes; a name that delists mid-window is marked at its last trade.

Every ticker here links to its live page — peer-relative metrics, a percentile fingerprint, and screeners across the whole S&P 500.

Stox →